எவ்வளவு முயன்றும்
மண்ணில் பதிய முடியா வேர்கள்
ஆகாசத்தில் ஊன்றி
நீல காற்றை சுவாசித்து வளர்ந்தன...
வேர்கள் அறியவில்லை
இது ஒரு வினோத முயற்சியென்று...
30 September 2011
14 September 2011
Serious Men - by Manu Joseph
It's a clean and transparent plot - Ayyan Mani works in the institute of Theory and Research in Mumbai as a personal assistant to the director Arvind Acharya. While the latter boasts of a stellar career in research and a zealous search for the ultimate truth, the former lives in a chawl and has only one aim - to make the lives of his wife and son a bit better and more out-of-the-ordinary than it actually is. Acharya's arch rival in the Institute is his friend from schooldays Nambudri and his gang of radio astronomers. Portrayed as "lesser" scientists this gang is more easily led by fashionable research than the Director Acharya and this often creates friction between them in matters of funding and space. Into this equilibrating stream arrives turbulence in the form of the beautiful Oparna Goshmaulik, who comes to collaborate with Acharya on his pet project - looking for microbes from outer space.
(Well naturally when I describe Oparna as turbulence I am only stating the way she is projected in the novel and this has no inputs from me personally)
The mesh of interactions between Ayyan, Acharya and Oparna form the basis of the story of Serious Men.
The novel is extremely well written, excellently easy to read and flows fast and has a clarity of writing that many a writer would envy. There are also some points where I tend to feel more sensitivity would have made it a work of art instead of a commodity. Since the novel's already a big hit there's no danger in me stating reasons for saying that here -
Ayyan Mani's portrayal as a Dalit and Oparna's fatal attraction to Acharya have a plastic and forced quality about them - they are seen plainly to be the devices that were put in to make the plot work. Similarly, the shallowness of the experiment that Acharya is all so fired up about strikes a discordant chord. This too appears too deliberate - why microbes, why not neutrinos? It's very fishy.
Manu Joseph's defence for writing about a dalit in negative terms is that he has broken a barrier, an elitist mindset towards viewing the Dalit with compassion... buried into this defence itself is a monolithic image of Dalits that I really object to. Besides all this, making him a cunning man who eavesdrops on his bosses calls (he goes to ingenious lengths to do so, which is where the science fiction really works) and steals quiz papers and does all kinds of underhand things in the novel...Not to mention the way he speaks of women in general and brahmin women in particular.
There's much more one can say, about the absence of anyone except Tamils Bengalis and Malayalees in the institute etc but it's better to read the novel and decide for yourself...
(Well naturally when I describe Oparna as turbulence I am only stating the way she is projected in the novel and this has no inputs from me personally)
The mesh of interactions between Ayyan, Acharya and Oparna form the basis of the story of Serious Men.
The novel is extremely well written, excellently easy to read and flows fast and has a clarity of writing that many a writer would envy. There are also some points where I tend to feel more sensitivity would have made it a work of art instead of a commodity. Since the novel's already a big hit there's no danger in me stating reasons for saying that here -
Ayyan Mani's portrayal as a Dalit and Oparna's fatal attraction to Acharya have a plastic and forced quality about them - they are seen plainly to be the devices that were put in to make the plot work. Similarly, the shallowness of the experiment that Acharya is all so fired up about strikes a discordant chord. This too appears too deliberate - why microbes, why not neutrinos? It's very fishy.
Manu Joseph's defence for writing about a dalit in negative terms is that he has broken a barrier, an elitist mindset towards viewing the Dalit with compassion... buried into this defence itself is a monolithic image of Dalits that I really object to. Besides all this, making him a cunning man who eavesdrops on his bosses calls (he goes to ingenious lengths to do so, which is where the science fiction really works) and steals quiz papers and does all kinds of underhand things in the novel...Not to mention the way he speaks of women in general and brahmin women in particular.
There's much more one can say, about the absence of anyone except Tamils Bengalis and Malayalees in the institute etc but it's better to read the novel and decide for yourself...
07 September 2011
A Short Note Against Death Penalty
'An Eye for and Eye makes the whole world Blind'
And this is a much milder statement than what is applicable to state sponsored death penalty. The above statement is reminiscent of a feudal system where retribution of a personal kind is sought between equals or people of comparable power. In the case of the death penalty, we have the huge and powerful state acting on behalf of certain individuals to enact the death penalty. So it is a much stronger statement that has to be written against death penalty than the above one.
Can one state orchestrated murder be the answer for another? The all powerful state can easily afford to invest time and resources on the analysis of what is the sickness that gives rise to violence and crime. By matching a death for another, it need not pretend to be less powerful than it is or, in other words, try to make out that it is only equal to the murderer.
Above lines are in response to rajan kurai's note on facebook
And this is a much milder statement than what is applicable to state sponsored death penalty. The above statement is reminiscent of a feudal system where retribution of a personal kind is sought between equals or people of comparable power. In the case of the death penalty, we have the huge and powerful state acting on behalf of certain individuals to enact the death penalty. So it is a much stronger statement that has to be written against death penalty than the above one.
Can one state orchestrated murder be the answer for another? The all powerful state can easily afford to invest time and resources on the analysis of what is the sickness that gives rise to violence and crime. By matching a death for another, it need not pretend to be less powerful than it is or, in other words, try to make out that it is only equal to the murderer.
Above lines are in response to rajan kurai's note on facebook
26 August 2011
Fasting for justice
Today Anna Hazare is the face of TV - thanks to his very successful promotion at the beginning stages of his movement and mobilising of huge crowds. There are multiple views on him which have come out into the open and it is anybody;s guess how things are going to take a turn. But another person who has been on a fast for nearly eleven years now - Irom Sharmila Chanu, a manipuri girl, daughter of a Class IV employee of an Imphal Veterinary Hospital was only twenty-eight when she began a fast to end the draconian Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act of 1958.
It was 2 November 2000, when after a bout of insurgency the army shot down ten civilians including a 62-year-old woman and 18-year-old Sinam Chandramani, winner of the National Bravery Award of 1988. It was a thursday and Irom Sharmila was on a fast as was usual and seeing the brutality she was moved to take this drastic step. The next day, she ate some pastries and sweets, that was her last meal and her Fast commenced on 4 November 2000. Now it is set to enter its 11th year. After the initial few days, she was accused of attempting suicide and arrested by the government, since which time, she is being force fed by means of a tube through her nose.
Described as delicate and fair skinned with curly hair and not what you would expect if you were looking for charismatic rhetoric or cliched heat of heroism (Tehelka - 5 Dec 2009), she is a quiet but phenomenally determined person. 4 November 2000 when she took her mother's blessing was the last time she saw her face to face. The reson being not to lose her determination to go on.
Now, over ten years later, Irom Sharmila's health has deteriorated, her menstrual cycles have stopped and she is depressed yet steady in her resolve to go on. Her fast has received a bit of media attention, she has been given many awards yet teh reason for her protest remains...
Will the government take another look at her in this situation?
Even as I write this post protestors are gathering around three women who are going on a fast to protest the death penalty been awarded to Three people Santhan Perarivalan and Murugan in Rajiv Gandhi's murder case. They have been awarded 21 years in jail and should they be awarded death too after that, is the question in everyone's minds. Human rights activists are pushing for abolition of death penalty at all as a punishment, as it is inhuman to put a person through that particular brand of torture. Will they win the government's sympathy?
It was 2 November 2000, when after a bout of insurgency the army shot down ten civilians including a 62-year-old woman and 18-year-old Sinam Chandramani, winner of the National Bravery Award of 1988. It was a thursday and Irom Sharmila was on a fast as was usual and seeing the brutality she was moved to take this drastic step. The next day, she ate some pastries and sweets, that was her last meal and her Fast commenced on 4 November 2000. Now it is set to enter its 11th year. After the initial few days, she was accused of attempting suicide and arrested by the government, since which time, she is being force fed by means of a tube through her nose.
Described as delicate and fair skinned with curly hair and not what you would expect if you were looking for charismatic rhetoric or cliched heat of heroism (Tehelka - 5 Dec 2009), she is a quiet but phenomenally determined person. 4 November 2000 when she took her mother's blessing was the last time she saw her face to face. The reson being not to lose her determination to go on.
Now, over ten years later, Irom Sharmila's health has deteriorated, her menstrual cycles have stopped and she is depressed yet steady in her resolve to go on. Her fast has received a bit of media attention, she has been given many awards yet teh reason for her protest remains...
Will the government take another look at her in this situation?
Even as I write this post protestors are gathering around three women who are going on a fast to protest the death penalty been awarded to Three people Santhan Perarivalan and Murugan in Rajiv Gandhi's murder case. They have been awarded 21 years in jail and should they be awarded death too after that, is the question in everyone's minds. Human rights activists are pushing for abolition of death penalty at all as a punishment, as it is inhuman to put a person through that particular brand of torture. Will they win the government's sympathy?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)